Books Computers Electronics Home & Garden Jewelry
Movies
Music Toys
Search for: in
Alien Resurrection (Collector's Edition)
by Fox Home Entertainme
Alien Resurrection (Collector's Edition) - Click to Enlarge
Avg. Rating: 2.6 of 5 stars (based on 5 reviews)
$10.99 to $25.77 from 49 stores
Similar ItemsNEW!
Alien 3
$5.00 to $15.00 from 36 stores
Aliens (Special Edition)
$3.00 to $22.98 from 36 stores

See more below
Information Below:  Store Prices  |  Customer Reviews  |  Similar Items


Compare Store Prices
View: All
Sort By
Store Name
Sort By
Store Rating
Sort By
Price
Sort By
Shipping
 
Description
 
Buy
* Prices and availability are subject to change without notice. Please check the merchant store for details.
List Your Products -
Customers Who Viewed This Item Also Viewed

Alien 3
$5.00 to $15.00 from 36 stores

Aliens (Special Edition)
$3.00 to $22.98 from 36 stores

Alien - The Director's Cut (Collector's Edition)
$8.25 to $22.94 from 6 stores

AVP - Alien Vs. Predator (Widescreen Edition)
$2.99 to $21.07 from 36 stores

Predator (Widescreen Collector's Edition)
$6.94 to $22.94 from 5 stores

The Terminator (Special Edition)
$3.49 to $19.95 from 5 stores

Terminator 3 - Rise of the Machines (Widescreen Edition)
$1.25 to $14.99 from 25 stores

T2 - Extreme DVD
$5.00 to $29.98 from 6 stores

Blade (New Line Platinum Series)
$2.25 to $13.92 from 36 stores

The Lost World - Jurassic Park (Widescreen Collector's Edition)
$5.99 to $14.98 from 36 stores

Aliens (Collector's Edition)
$7.99 to $24.29 from 36 stores

The Chronicles of Riddick (Unrated Widescreen Edition)
$2.99 to $20.99 from 5 stores

Customer Reviews
0 out of 2 people found the following review helpful:
1 of 5 stars  THIS MOVIE SUCKS
Saturday, April 30, 2005
I'm tellin you do not rent or buy this movie. it is the worst and give a HUGE descrace to the fanchise. Allthough i have'nt seen Alien 3 i hear from people that it would've been the best place to stop. What ever you do, DO NOT BUY OR RENT OR EVEN TOUCH THIS MOVIE. I rented this from my local library and a regreted it. THIS MOVIE IS cow $H!T

1 out of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5 of 5 stars  A film with excellent potential, but horrid execution
Sunday, March 06, 2005
This is one of those movies that should have been much better than it should have been. It featured a script from one of my favorite creative artists, Joss Whedon of BUFFY THE VAMPIRE and ANGEL fame, direction by Jean-Pierre Jeunet (director of A VERY LONG ENGAGEMENT, AMELIE, and CITY OF LOST CHILDREN), and reprises the greatest female action hero in movie history: Ellen Ripley. Or at least her clone. In 1997 when this was released Whedon was not yet known for what he would achieve with BUFFY on television nor Jeunet for what he would do with AMELIE and A VERY LONG ENGAGEMENT, but in retrospect the film on paper seems utterly ideal. First, you had the matching of Whedon with Ripley. More than any other recent American screen writer, Joss Whedon feels at home with strong female characters. He was, after all, the one who created in Buffy the supreme female action hero of our time (and set the stage for a host of imitators such as Max Guevera on DARK ANGEL and Sydney Bristow in ALIAS). Who better to write the screenplay for the fourth film in the ALIEN sequence? Unfortunately, although no other writers are credited, his script was extensively rewritten during production. Whedon has since disavowed his involvement with the film, and refused to be involved with the commentaries for the ALIEN boxed set.

One would have to agree with Whedon that the final outcome is not that great. One can often glimpse great potential in the film, but there is also a feeling that much of it was made on the fly, and that it is the victim of constant compromises. We know, for instance, that dozens of scenes had to be modified or altered for financial or other considerations. One also wonders to what extent Jeunet was the right person for the director's position. I have to confess to not being one of his fans. I loved AMELIE, but as I've seen his other films, I have reluctantly come to the conclusion that while he possesses an extraordinary eye and can produce films that are wondrous to look at, he is seriously challenged by narrative. CITY OF LOST CHILDREN is a haunting film to watch, but the story really isn't worth discussing. A VERY LONG ENGAGEMENT is one of the most incoherent major releases of the past couple of decades, despite being exquisitely beautiful in very nearly every frame. Even AMELIE succeeds more as something to look at than as a story to follow. This is not a good combo for a writer like Whedon who is obsessed with narrative. They do not play off one another's strengths. My own suspicion is that the final film is a result of the wrong director for the wrong set up financially-minded producers to produce a screenplay that didn't mesh with the strengths of either the director or the producers. But the brute fact is that the film was severely under-budgeted (it was made for between $50 and $60 million, which was not much even in 1996-97 for a major science-fiction film), and too many compromises had to be made, especially considering that much of the budget had to go for salary.

Nonetheless, there are still many memorable moments in the movie, and all in all I'm glad it was made rather than not made. I do wish a different director had been involved, someone who understood narrative and was good at exposition. But what we have is often interesting. Ripley is simply the best female movie action hero ever, and anytime we get to see Sigourney Weaver reprise the role is something to be grateful for (there have been rumors on and off over the past few years that we might see one more ALIEN film). In this film she is a clone, and a disturbed clone at that. She is simultaneously world-weary and psychotic. She's been stripped of the compassion that was found in the first films, the intense passion for life. Only gradually does she regain some of her humanity in the course of the film. I liked Winona Ryder's turn as the android Annalee Call (which creates an odd conflict in Ripley, who has a history with androids), and many of the other characters as well. The cast wasn't the problem with the film. The problem with the film is the sense that everything is being done on the cheap.

Many Whedonesque touches survive in the dialogue. Before getting the chance to do BUFFY on TV, Whedon worked extensively as a script doctor, his job being to add sparkle and one liners to otherwise moribund scripts. It isn't an accident that BUFFY has perhaps more great one liners of any show in the history of American TV. The guy can write a great line. So, ALIEN RESURRECTION has a host of great lines, many of them containing words that makes it impossible to repeat here. But you have to love an exchange like:

Johner: So, I hear you, like, ran into these things before?
Ripley: Yeah.
Johner: What did you do?
Ripley: I died.

Or when Ripley is talking to someone who has had one of the aliens implanted in his chest for gestation:

Purvis: WHAT'S [expletive deleted] INSIDE ME?
Ripley: There's a monster in your chest. These guys hijacked your ship, and they sold your cryotube to this... human, and he put an alien inside of you. It's a really nasty one. And in a few hours, it's gonna burst its way through your rib cage, and you're gonna die. Any questions?
Purvis: Who are you?
Ripley: I'm the monster's mother.

Or this great line:

Distephano: I thought you were dead!
Ripley: Yeah, I get that a lot.

There is a lot of great talk like this in the film. Unfortunately, the talk is a whole lot better than the sets and the action. Throughout there is a sense of lack, as if things are not quite finished, or not sufficiently developed. All in all, it is better than nothing, and I think over the next few decades I'll go back to this from time to time, but it is always going to be more of a could-have-been than anything else.

The previews to this film when it first came out did provide one of the great comic moments of my life. I was sitting in the theater with the woman I was dating at the time, an utterly brilliant and astonishingly cute anthropology Ph.D. student at the University of Chicago (today graduated and teaching in a Midwestern university). I was trying to explain to her who Dan Hedaya was, developing my theory that for many years there was a secret contract somewhere that determined that he had to appear in every other film made in Hollywood, and had mentioned several of his roles, none of which struck home. In exasperation I said, "I swear, the guy is in everything!" At which point the lights went down and the previews began, the first of which was for ALIEN RESURRECTION and which began with a shot of Dan Hedaya. I elbowed her and said, "That's Dan Hedaya!" "Oh," she said, "he's in everything!" Just a perfect moment.

1 out of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5 of 5 stars  takes all three films and shocks the best for last
Friday, February 25, 2005
this film takes all the humor, shocking visuals
and ups them to their fullest
there is more humor
more action
more gut wrenching almost ready to puke visuals that one can take
I'm glad I have this on dvd as well
the directors of this Alien series are brilliant
each one recreated the terror even more terrifying every movie
and the best for last ( this one) lives up to it's predecessors
it not only shocks more
but the story gets more deep then the other 3 ever would
they all had great stories
and will always be watchable over and over
but this one really hooks you in the most
with its whole storyline and plot
truly a sick and amusing film
worth 3 Emmy's if you ask me
one for best actress
one for supporting actress
and one for best direction in sci fi horror movie

1 out of 4 people found the following review helpful:
1 of 5 stars  "Kiiiilllll Meeeeeee."
Friday, February 11, 2005
This film didn't even deserve the one star it got from me, but that's the lowest option Amazon gave. I thought the third film was terrible, but this one takes the cake. The premise is this, Ripley is cloned many years after her death and she spawns an Alien queen from scientists tampering with genetic engineering. After she escapes with some more tough characters who we don't care about, she ends up killing a relative Alien born from her own Queen Alien which has its face ripped off by the half alien, half human alien, yeah, stupid. Ripley cries as her child Alien dies and a scientist looms over the situation and says one bad line after the other like "Look, a little baby," and " a perfect butterfly." The movie finally ends and Ripley is finally brought down to Earth, lets hope the movie studios milking this series to death are brought back to Earth as well. Terrible waste of time and money and not including one of the great creature creations ever. Yuck!

2 out of 5 people found the following review helpful:
1 of 5 stars  What can I say?
Wednesday, February 02, 2005
I wish the Aliens had gotten to Jean-Pierre Jeunet before he was allowed to release this garbage. This movie served no purpose other than to affirm that the Alien franchise is indeed dead. One of the worst sequels in the history of film.

See all customer reviews...
Home  |  About Priceflo  |  Tell a Friend  |  List Your Products  |  Merchant Login  |  Site Map  |  Help

© 2008, Priceflo, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service