Books Computers Electronics Home & Garden Jewelry
Movies
Music Toys
Search for: in
Bad Company
by Buena Vista Home Vid
Bad Company - Click to Enlarge
Avg. Rating: 3.4 of 5 stars (based on 5 reviews)
$0.89 to $17.99 from 6 stores
Similar ItemsNEW!
Down to Earth
$2.19 to $11.99 from 5 stores
XXX (Widescreen Special Edition)
$0.99 to $15.96 from 6 stores

See more below
Information Below:  Store Prices  |  Customer Reviews  |  Similar Items


Compare Store Prices
View: All
Sort By
Store Name
Sort By
Store Rating
Sort By
Price
Sort By
Shipping
 
Description
 
Buy
* Prices and availability are subject to change without notice. Please check the merchant store for details.
List Your Products -
Customers Who Viewed This Item Also Viewed

Down to Earth
$2.19 to $11.99 from 5 stores

XXX (Widescreen Special Edition)
$0.99 to $15.96 from 6 stores

Head of State (Widescreen Edition)
$0.50 to $14.99 from 7 stores

Changing Lanes
$0.95 to $13.49 from 6 stores

S.W.A.T. (Widescreen Special Edition)
$1.31 to $19.99 from 7 stores

Collateral (Widescreen Two-Disc Edition)
$1.95 to $21.44 from 4 stores

Rush Hour (New Line Platinum Series)
$1.50 to $13.91 from 6 stores

Out of Time
$0.99 to $12.99 from 5 stores

The Recruit
$1.99 to $15.99 from 6 stores

What's the Worst That Could Happen?
$0.99 to $12.99 from 5 stores

Training Day
$1.00 to $10.99 from 5 stores

Bad Boys II
$1.90 to $21.72 from 6 stores

Customer Reviews
1 out of 1 people found the following review helpful:
3 of 5 stars  Better than expected
Monday, March 07, 2005
After hearing a lot of negative comments on this movie I really expected the worst. Perhaps that is why it is a lot better then expected.

First of all there is the director and producer: Jerry Bruckheimer, you either lover or hate his productions. He is probably the world's most famous producer and many of his productions arevery recognisable, this is one of these typical Bruckheimer productions. But where most of these typically well known Bruckheimer action-movies are are directed by Michael Bay this one was done by Joel Schumacher. Schumacher nowadays finally is slowly getting recognision for his work, however in the days this movie was made he still sufferend from the negative opinion on his Batman attempts. It is widely agreed that the first two Batmans were batter than the latter two. That can indeed be blamed on Schumacher, but it was not his own choice to make his versions of Batman less dark and Gothic than the first two, it was the choice of the people he worked for(WB&Producers). Bad Company movie was not good enough to really improve his status, but it did the job and was good enough to keep him more than accepted in the industry.

The actors: Anthony Hopkins plays a role that seems a sort of crossing between the characters he played in 'The mask of Zorro' and 'Mission Impossible 2' but with a bit more fysical action. He does not have to use a lot of his qualities as an actor, and it can hardly be denied that some of his qualities are wasted in this movies, but we see some chemistry with Chris Rock(but that is also result of his quality as an actor), and even although this movie may not demand all of Hopkins' qualities, we don't have to be sorry for him. He has made clear in interviews that he can find himself at home in a movie like this, and that he has a very down to earth idea about the acting profession.

Chris Rock acts pretty decently. He is a respectable komedian but at best an average actor. I must admit some moments are almost ashaming, but others are pretty good. He seems a bit out of place in the whole picture, that tries to be realistic an serious, while Chris Rock can only really shine in a good comedy setting. It almost seems like they got him into the project thinking he could become a sort of second Will Smith or even Eddie Murphy, although with his very own character. Unfortunately his acting is not always up to par, at least it goes not go very well with the vision of the director and this is one of the main reasons why the movie does not really know where it wants to go, and goes a little bit in every direction, but nowhere in particular.

This is the biggest problem of this movie, it seems like the product of conflicting visions. It has no definition or direction where it wants to go. It tries to do a little (buddy)comedy, it tries to be a sort of stylish action movie (some of the shots and locations are among the best in action movies in the last few years. These two directions create a bit of conflict in many movies, but here this tension is really of bad influence, it can't become humoristic enough nor stylish enough to really work. So it can't stick out enough in the masses of action movies.

The second problem is that there are a lot of Clichees in this movie. The way the characters are introduced. It really seems the story relies on formulas to quickly recall instantly recognisable concepts of characters. This way the characters remain a bit opf cardboard characters or puppets. It is just impossible to create truely interesting character development if the character is made by stereotypes and formulas.

The editing is not always very good. The action sequences are often very well done... wel paced, nice use of cinematography etc. But the other parts don't alway have the right pace timing and style.

Even although this movie has some big problems it is still a decent action movie that is worth watching. The action sequenses are good with clear cinematography, perhaps a bit slow for some, but imho that made it only better. It is a Bruckheimer film, so that is what you should expect. If you want to see a perfect exaample of an action thriller that is a reference still today try" the day of the jackal(1973)" ,or if you really want something modern and are not into Bruckheimer yet "Enemy of the state" is the better choise. But if you want to see a movie that is generally entertaining, knows what Bruckheimer stands for and don't mind that the good (action) moments that are there in the movie are intervened by a lot of average and some bad ones it is surely worth the try. You will be surprised by some (hidden) qualities it offers. My advice is really to watch (rent) it before you buy it. It is definately worth watching once but I can't guarantee you like it.

1 out of 1 people found the following review helpful:
2 of 5 stars  Mr. Rock two times in the same movie!
Thursday, February 17, 2005
Silly and predictable thriller without any trace of originality. Chris Rock, a most overreacting actor, plays a double part, Kevin Pope and Michael Turner, the first one a vagabond and the latter an inteligent and cold secret agent from the CIA. But they are twin brothers! (what a great idea!)and Mr. Turner (the agent) is killed in action and Mr. Pope must replace him for the sucess of the mission.
With that premise, the movie goes on only based upon the abominable jokes and gags of Rock and some unimpressive action scenes and car chases. A waste of time for a competent actor as Anthony Hopkins. And for you too.

4 of 5 stars  A little slow but worthwhile
Thursday, October 21, 2004
This seems like a rehash of CIA movies and it's no wonder the CIA had problems finding Osama (there's a funny moment where Chris Rock dresses down a too-cool-for-himself spy: "You can't even find Saddam Hussein...You tell a sister to find Saddam Hussein at 8 in the morning and by 5 o'clock she'd be saying 'Saddam get out of my house!'" I'm paraphrasing obviously.) However, Hopkins and Rock make a surprisingly effective team with more chemistry than other on-screen duos. Rock's Jake emerges as a wanna-do-well with a sincere love for his girlfriend, who emerges as a female with a mind of her own (despite an interfering family), a tenderness for his churchoging mama, and a sense of right and wrong. It's a little absurd when he yells while chasing down the thermonuclear device that is the focus of this spy thriller, "I wanna be home and watch Oprah!" Oprah would tell him to do the right thing too.

2 out of 2 people found the following review helpful:
4 of 5 stars  Better Then I Expected
Wednesday, October 13, 2004
Ok I didn't have the highest of expectations but it was an entertaining film. You've got to admit no one expected Anthony Hopkins and Chris Rock to ever team up in a movie. Without them this movie would have been a complete flop. The plot was fairly predictable but it didn't keep the jokes and action scenes from being entertaining.

1 out of 1 people found the following review helpful:
4 of 5 stars  Bad Company
Tuesday, September 14, 2004
I really liked this movie even though most reviews I've read give this movie an average rating, it deserves an above average rating. Chris Rock isn't as raw in his comedy as he is today however, it is a Disney made movie because Touchstone is owned by Disney so anytime you see Touchstone the movie will more than likely be more conservative. The movie was really entertaining especially being a huge fan of Anthony Hopkins and Chris Rock. Who would think to put the combination of stars (Anthony and Chris) together and have it work so well together. Plus both of the actors were believable. It's definitly worth watching and I'm going to buy this one on DVD.

See all customer reviews...
Home  |  About Priceflo  |  Tell a Friend  |  List Your Products  |  Merchant Login  |  Site Map  |  Help

© 2003-2005, Priceflo, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service