Books Computers Electronics Home & Garden Jewelry Movies Music Toys
Video (VHS)
Search for: in
Sympathy for the Devil
by Uni/Abkco
Sympathy for the Devil - Click to Enlarge
Avg. Rating: 2.4 of 5 stars (based on 5 reviews)
$4.29 to $99.99 from 5 stores
This version of Jean-Luc Godard's 1968 One Plus One caused a legendary confrontation at a film festival… Read more
Similar ItemsNEW!
Un Chien Andalou / Land Without Bread
$9.58 to $23.70 from 3 stores
Performance
$34.95 to $59.88 from 2 stores

See more below
Information Below:  Store Prices  |  Customer Reviews  |  Similar Items


Compare Store Prices
View: All
Sort By
Store Name
Sort By
Store Rating
Sort By
Price
Sort By
Shipping
 
Description
 
Buy
* Prices and availability are subject to change without notice. Please check the merchant store for details.
List Your Products -
Customers Who Viewed This Item Also Viewed

Un Chien Andalou / Land Without Bread
$9.58 to $23.70 from 3 stores

Performance
$34.95 to $59.88 from 2 stores

Product Description
Sympathy for the Devil
Description
This version of Jean-Luc Godard's 1968 One Plus One caused a legendary confrontation at a film festival when the director became infuriated at his producer's decision to attach the Rolling Stones' completed song "Sympathy for the Devil" at the film's end. Godard's own original plan had been to make a film of the Stones' construction of the tune in rehearsal, and intercut that with a story line about a white revolutionary who becomes suicidal when her lover embraces black separatism. Production problems caused Godard to give up that idea and just allow scenes to fall where they would, allowing viewers to construct the film in their own minds. Be that as it may, this slightly shorter and more commercial producer's cut does not lack in satisfaction by closing things out with the song as Stones fans know it. Overall, the film is a bewildering affair, and that's not at all a bad thing: one's orientation is whatever one makes of Godard's enthralling mess here. Even if a viewer is just interested in seeing the Stones at their peak and at work on their brilliant 1968 album Beggars Banquet, this is a highly rewarding experience. Astute watchers and listeners will note that in an early take of the song, Mick Jagger sings the lyric, "I shouted out, 'Who killed Kennedy?'/When after all, it was you and me." Later, with no mention of a particularly tragic 1968 event in American politics, Jagger has revised the line to "I shouted out, 'Who killed the Kennedys?'" Talk about a startling moment. --Tom Keogh
Customer Reviews
1 out of 2 people found the following review helpful:
1 of 5 stars  a stone fan
Saturday, August 07, 2004
just got this, the stones are great, the rest sucks....I can't even make to the end, my wife just laughs at me every time I put it in to try to see the end. sorry it sucks........

2 out of 3 people found the following review helpful:
3 of 5 stars  Stones Great, Goddard Blows
Sunday, July 25, 2004
Having grown up in the 60s, I have to say I saw some asinine, pretentious crap mixed in with the earnest good intentions. The studio footage in this DVD is great, the Goddard contributions and cuts are just plain aggravating. And embarassing. That part is so bad, it makes me cringe for my generation, and I thought about returning the DVD. But it's worth keeping for the Stones in the studio. I guess this is (more) proof that art and politics rarely mix well. DC

1 out of 2 people found the following review helpful:
1 of 5 stars  pretentious, god-awful CRAP
Friday, February 06, 2004
Just how many times can one listen to half-assed versions of the same unfinished song? Well, for about three hours I suppose. Not only does the song never seem to end but it is also sandwiched between the avant-god-awful cinema of who-ever-the-hell the guy with the camera is.

word to the wise, buy this only if you want to torture yourself or your guests.


3 out of 4 people found the following review helpful:
2 of 5 stars  Godard as poseur, the Stones as artists
Sunday, December 07, 2003
At the time this film was made, Godard's reputation was as a great avant-garde artist while the Stones were mere pop singers. Thirty-odd years on, the roles are reversed. It can be seen that the Stones created something lasting while Godard's contributions to this movie are cinematically amateurish and politically primitive. Unfortunately Godard wasn't enough of an artist to appreciate the material he had, and so he keeps cutting away from the Stones to add various undergraduate-level film tricks. The net result is increased appreciation for the professionalism and discipline of the boys -- well, of Jagger, Richards, Wyman and Watts (Brian Jones is a silent, stoned presence playing inaudible rhythm guitar) -- because it contrasts so strongly with the lack of professionalism and discipline in the film itself.

5 of 5 stars  Great insight in song writing
Friday, September 12, 2003
This video is a great insight into the construction of a great song. The magic of Keith Richards & Mick Jaggar in pulling the song together is a must see. On early attempts of the song you would think they would give it away but to their credit they persist and create the song of the century .. well in my books at least. The weird clips in between the recording sessions are very weird. I suspect they could be used as an anti-drugs message .. highly recommended

See all customer reviews...
Home  |  About Priceflo  |  Tell a Friend  |  List Your Products  |  Merchant Login  |  Site Map  |  Help

© 2003-2005, Priceflo, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service